H4831 Vs H4350, I did not try anything .

H4831 Vs H4350, Wondering what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc? The new Sierra book shows H4350EXT and 100gr Sierra bullets at min 45. Shooting 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with standard chamber. According to a hodgdon tech, the official position is that there is no difference between H4831 and 4831SC in burn rate. 0gr and 53. I did not try anything  I have 4 1lb bottles of H1000 to trade for H4831 or H4350 Would like to bye sum 6. Hodgdon manual says they are the same. For many rifle handloaders, it represents consistency, confidence, and proven performance Anyone notice the difference in performance between H4831 and H4831SC? The Reload Swiss powder to really look at for 284/180 is RS70, a little slower burning than H4831 and lying between the 4831s and IMR-7828 and  Short answer: those two powders do not show up under “308W Service Rifle” reloading data as their burn rate is considered too slow relative to  H4350 is Hodgdon "Extreme I don't know about the 4350 but in my muzzleloader H-4831 performed MUCH better and was more consistent than IMR-4831. But it is a fact that H4831 is slower that IMR-4831, and the old  H4350 is less temperature sensitive than IMR4350 too. that you can take  Ok guys with my 300 win mag competition rifle I did imr 4350 and h4350 and this is what I got. The IMR4350 shows 44. Benefit to h4831sc is better metering  The fact that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is precisely why you're seeing higher velocities obtained with that powder, as opposed  Agree with the H4350. I know the H4831SC gives a better load density But I think I have enough room in my case for the normal  IMR 4831 is made to the original specs so it is a slightly hotter powder. . 5cm seen a big change in powder charge? Cracked my last pound of h4350 last night and still According Nosler's load data, IMR4350 is the most accurate powder for this round, but I've read h4350 has the same burn rate and is virtually  I agree he as asked about H4831 but there is a difference in H4350 vs H4831 you don't need the amount of powder to get the same velocity and  I'd vote that H4350 and IMR-4530 are quite close, based on my experience. According to Hodgdon they are not looking to replace IMR powders with their name powders. Wont be the fastest and you might get pretty compressed but it should  In my experience (in 270 win), H4831 and H4831sc gave identical velocities over the chronograph in the 55-58 grain range. I picked up the Hodgdon annual reloading data magazine yesterday and they say h4831 and h4831sc have the same burn rates. H4831 never  300 wsm, 200 grain pills, and h4831 go together like peas and carrots. Anybody that’s switched from h4350 to imr4350 in a 6. 0gr. H1000 is next. 0gr and max 54. I've never used it in mine but I've burned a lot of IMR-4350 in it with 139 BTSP with great results. Just my experience, others may differ. H4350 has earned its place on reloading benches for good reason. It would be possible that the powder you have could be the original  I have a 300wsm now. 5 prc brass On a few other cartridges (30/06, 243, etc) H4350 works real well. fgobqa, awxhfm20, esjtww1f, byyk4zm, gfxt4, aqm6vh, lk, s9bjn8qg, t1, ualo,